Suffecool 2014.
Methods | RCT | |
Participants | Inclusion criteria: nulliparous, 18 years or older, GA 37 weeks or more, singleton, cephalic presentation, intact membranes, BS < 6, admission for IOL. Exclusion criteria: contraindication for vaginal delivery (placenta praevia, non vertex presentation), ruptured membranes, severe pre‐eclampsia, suspected fetal growth restriction with abnormal dopplers, presence of a uterine scar, non reassuring FHR trace requiring medical intervention. |
|
Interventions | 1. 10 mg dinoprostone vaginal insert (n = 31), max 12 hours, if after 12 hours unfavourable cervix start with oxytocin 2. Double balloon (Cook) (n = 31), 80 mL, oxytocin started 6 hours after placement. Balloon removed after max 12 hours. |
|
Outcomes | Time from insertion of ripening method until delivery, delivery rate < 24 hours, CS rate, time to active labour, rate of operative vaginal delivery, maternal or fetal adverse events | |
Notes | Setting: USA Study period: February 2011 ‐ September 2012 Funding: not reported Declarations of interest: none declared |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer‐generated numbers |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | The allocation assignment was sealed in sequentially‐numbered, opaque envelopes |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not feasible due to nature of intervention |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | ITT, no missing data or cases. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All pre‐specified outcomes were reported in results |
Other bias | Low risk | No other bias detected |