Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 10;20:27. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6498-z

Table 4.

Adjusted multivariate survival analyses

Comparison of staining p53 SSTR-2a CgA
HR (CI) p HR (CI) p HR (CI) p
All 3 categories without dichotomisation 1.26 (0.99–1.60) 0.07 0.91 (0.72–1.15) 0.41 0.89 (0.69–1.15) 0.38
A: Neg (vs. het-pos) 1.88 (1.01–3.49) 0.05* 1.18 (0.61–2.29) 0.63 2.11 (1.15–3.88) 0.02*
B: Het-pos (vs. pos) 0.33 (0.19–0.60) < 0.001* 1.18 (0.54–2.58) 0.68 1.13 (0.68–1.87) 0.63
C: Pos (vs. neg) 1.30 (0.83–2.04) 0.25 0.84 (0.52–1.35) 0.47 0.78 (0.47–1.30) 0.34
D: Neg (vs. het-pos + pos) 1.03 (0.67–1.58) 0.88 1.19 (0.78–1.82) 0.41 1.39 (0.89–2.18) 0.15
E: Het-pos (vs. neg + pos) 0.45 (0.27–0.75) 0.002* 1.08 (0.57–2.04) 0.82 1.31 (0.84–2.04) 0.23
F: Pos (vs. het-pos + neg) 1.85 (1.24–2.76) 0.003* 0.84 (0.53–1.34) 0.47 0.97 (0.65–1.47) 0.89

Adjusted for age (> 65 years), gender, grade of differentiation (well- vs. poorly differentiated), primary tumour (pancreas vs. other primary tumours), tumour burden (locoregional disease vs. disseminated), performance status (PS > 2), and treatment (surgery or chemotherapy). The immune-staining outside the parenthesis in the column “Comparison of staining” indicated which score the HR relates to. *Indicates significant p-values < 0.05. Unadjusted HR (CI) and p-values are presented in Fig. 4, and were significant for p53 in the A and B comparison in the univariate analyses