Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 26;2019(11):CD009501. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009501.pub2

Comparison 3. Combined FFT & CWD vs sequential FFT‐CWD; Combined FFT & CSD vs sequential CWD‐FFT.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Depression ‐ CDRS‐R: end of treatment 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2 Depression ‐ CDRS‐R: 12‐month follow‐up 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3 Substance use ‐ square root % daily use: end of treatment 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
4 Substance use ‐ square root % daily use: 12‐month follow‐up 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
5 Premature termination 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
6 Treatment attendance 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only