Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 30;2015(7):CD001751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001751.pub3

Akinluyi 1987.

Methods Randomisation/allocation method unclear
 Double‐blind (participant and assessor), cross‐over trial
 60 women randomised and analysed
 Method of assessing adverse effects: unclear ‐ authors state only "women complained of..."
Participants Inclusion: primary dysmenorrhoea
 Exclusion: menstrual irregularities; history peptic ulcer, renal or blood disorders; pregnant; use of other medicines for condition
 Age: 17 to 33, mean 18.4
 Parity: 46 nulliparous (8 with previous pregnancy), 14 parous
 Source: volunteer student nurses/midwives and women from local gynaecological clinic
 Location: Nigeria
Interventions Piroxicam (20 mg), placebo
 2 tablets per day for 2 days, then 1 tablet per day until symptoms or menses subsided
 Duration: 4 cycles per participant, 240 cycles in total
Outcomes Pain ‐ abdominal cramps yes/no
 Pain scale (very severe, severe, moderate, slight)
 Adverse effects
Notes No mention of baseline or cross‐over analysis
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Method not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method not described
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Double‐blinded, identical placebo
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Adverse effects data collected prospectively but not reported in detail
Complete follow‐up? Low risk 60/60 analysed
Potential bias related to study funding Unclear risk Pharma