Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 30;2015(7):CD001751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001751.pub3

al‐Waili 1990.

Methods Random allocation, pharmacy‐coded drugs
 Cross‐over, double‐blind trial
 40 women randomised and analysed
 Method of assessing adverse effects: reported daily on a questionnaire at trial office (which they visited daily)
Participants Inclusion: primary dysmenorrhoea; diagnosed by results of questionnaire for self assessment, physical and gynaecological exams; regular cycles 24 to 31 days
 Exclusion: clinical pathology of genital tract; lactating or contemplating pregnancy; allergies to NSAIDs; use of OCP or other long‐term drug therapy
 Age: 18 to 40, mean 24
 Source: volunteers
 Location: Iraq
Interventions Indomethacin suppositories (100 mg, 1 to 3 times daily, at onset of symptoms, max. 5 days)
 Placebo suppositories
 Duration: 2 cycles per treatment/4 cycles in total
 No additional medication allowed during study
Outcomes Pain relief 0 to 18 scale
 Dysmenorrhoeic symptoms
 Side effects ‐ only counted if not experienced in previous menses
Notes Women visited clinic every day to ensure compliance
 Baseline assessment performed
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Method not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Adequate, "coded by pharmacy"
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Double‐blinded, codes broken at end of study. "All the patients were provided with identical suppositories"
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Adverse effects quantified
Complete follow‐up? Low risk All women completed the study
Potential bias related to study funding Unclear risk Not stated