Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 30;2015(7):CD001751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001751.pub3

Andersch 1989.

Methods Randomisation/allocation method unclear
 Double‐blind, cross‐over trial
 60 women randomised, 57 analysed
 Withdrawals, 1 pregnancy, 2 failed to attend follow‐up
 Method of assessing adverse effects: self reported prospectively on form
Participants Inclusion: women with primary dysmenorrhoea; no history or evidence of pelvic pathology as judged by clinical and gynaecological examinations
 Exclusion: pelvic pathology; IUD; history of peptic ulcer or dyspepsia; asthma; breastfeeding
 Age: 16 to 44, mean (SD) 29.3 (9.3)
 Parity: 37 nulliparous, 20 parous
 Contraception: 17 used OCP, the rest barrier or none
 Location: Sweden
Interventions Flurbiprofen (100 mg twice daily as needed)
 Naproxen sodium (500 mg twice daily)
 Treatment for a total of 5 days
 Duration: 4 cycles, 2 per treatment
Outcomes Pain relief: 5‐point scale
 Reported mean scores for each individual
 Interference with everyday life
 Days off work
 Additional analgesics
 No serious side effects reported
Notes Pain scores etc compared between groups at baseline and at each phase
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Method not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method not described
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Double‐blinded, code not broken until data processing, women and investigators blind. "The capsules supplied were identical to all outward appearance"
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Adverse effects data collected prospectively by patient and reported in detail
Complete follow‐up? Low risk 57/60 analysed (95%)
Potential bias related to study funding Unclear risk Not stated