Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 30;2015(7):CD001751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001751.pub3

Benassi 1993.

Methods Randomisation/allocation method unclear. Double‐blind, parallel trial
 30 women randomised and analysed
 Method of assessing adverse effects: self reported prospectively on chart
Participants Inclusion: primary dysmenorrhoea for at least 6 months of medium‐high gravity; regular menstrual cycles; nulliparous
 Exclusion: light menstrual upsets or irregularities, organic dysmenorrhoea, IUD or OCP use, allergies to NSAIDs, gastrointestinal problems
 Age: 15 to 25, mean 23.8 (2.6)
 Location: Italy
Interventions Meclofenamate sodium 100 mg, naproxen sodium 275 mg
 Taken at first sign of menses, then every 8 hours
 Duration: 1 control cycle, then 5 treatment cycles
Outcomes Pain assessment ‐ VAS (graph)
 Dysmenorrhoea symptoms
Notes No mention of baseline comparison. No numerical data reported for adverse effects
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Method not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method not described
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double‐blinded, placebo not described
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Women prospectively asked to record adverse effects
Complete follow‐up? Low risk 30/30 women analysed
Potential bias related to study funding Unclear risk Not stated