Methods |
Randomisation/allocation method unclear
Cross‐over, double‐blind trial
44 women randomised and analysed
Method of assessing adverse effects: not stated |
Participants |
Inclusion: primary dysmenorrhoea, medical and gynaecological exam
Exclusion: pelvic abnormality, history of dyspepsia or peptic ulceration, use of OCP
Age: 15 to 42, mean 22.6
Location: UK |
Interventions |
Flufenamic acid (200 mg 3 times daily while dysmenorrhoea persisted, encouraged to start medication a few hours prior to menses)
Placebo
Duration: 3 cycles per treatment/6 in total |
Outcomes |
Pain relief (4‐point scale)
Adverse effects |
Notes |
First‐phase data shown on graph as mean pain relief |
Risk of bias |
Bias |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) |
Unclear risk |
Method not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) |
Unclear risk |
Method not described |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes |
Low risk |
Double‐blinded, "identical" placebo |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) |
Unclear risk |
Data on adverse effects not systematically collected and/or reported |
Complete follow‐up? |
Low risk |
40/40 women analysed |
Potential bias related to study funding |
Unclear risk |
Parke‐Davis supplied drug and placebo |