Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 30;2015(7):CD001751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001751.pub3

Lopez Rosales 1989.

Methods Randomisation/allocation method unclear
 Double‐blind, parallel trial
 40 women randomised and analysed (plus additional 20 women on drug now withdrawn)
 Method of assessing adverse effects: assessed retrospectively at follow‐up
Participants Inclusion: primary or incapacitating dysmenorrhoea for at least 6 months, clinically and generally healthy women, pain susceptible to pharmacological treatment
 Exclusion: pelvic‐genital pathology, secondary dysmenorrhoea, IUD use, irregular menstrual cycles, OCP use, anticoagulants, gastric or peptic disease, hypersensitivity to anti‐inflammatories or steroids
 Age: 18 to 36, mean 28.5 (4.7)
 Location: Mexico
Interventions Nimesulide (100 mg every 12 hours)
 Fentiazac (100 mg every 12 hours)
 Mefenamic acid (500 mg every 8 hours)
 Medication taken 3 times a day with placebo tablets added to ensure blinding was maintained, treatment for 5 days starting day prior to menses
 Duration: 3 months
 No use of analgesics or anti‐inflammatories during study period
Outcomes Pain intensity 0 to 10 scale
Notes Spanish ‐ translated by Monica C Davis. Outcomes recorded per cycle rather than per participant
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Method not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method not described
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Double‐blinded, identical placebo
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Unclear whether adverse effects data prospectively solicited. Data reported per cycle not per woman
Complete follow‐up? Unclear risk Unclear
Potential bias related to study funding Unclear risk Unclear