Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 20;2019(11):CD003511. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003511.pub5

Le Vine 1964.

Methods Unit of randomization: pregnancy
 Method of randomization: women were alternated between 'Group A' and 'Group B'. It is unclear who decided which group would be treatment and which would be placebo
 Timing of randomization: within the 16th week of pregnancy
 Power calculation: no
 Blinding: yes (double)
 Number of centers: not stated
 56 women randomized, 26 women excluded, 30 women analyzed
Source of funding not stated
Participants Women who had had 3 consecutive miscarriages, were < 16 weeks' gestation and with no signs of threatened miscarriage in the current pregnancy
Age: 20‐42
Location: USA
 Timing and duration: unknown
Interventions 500 mg/week IM of hydroxyprogesterone caproate
Duration: until miscarriage or the 36th week of gestation
Control: placebo
Outcomes Miscarriage
 Side effects of treatment suffered by the mother
 Deformities in the baby
 Preterm birth
Notes Dates of study: not stated
Funding sources: not stated
Declarations of interest: not stated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk Alternating group A and B
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Alternating group A and B
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Stated double‐blind
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Not stated but unlikely that knowledge of assignment would influence outcomes
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk 56 women randomized, 26 women excluded, 30 women analyzed
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk None
Other bias Low risk None