Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 3;2019(10):CD012323. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012323.pub2

Summary of findings 2. Acellular dermal matrix versus control.

Acellular dermal matrix for patients undergoing parotidectomy
Patient or population: patients undergoing parotidectomy
 Settings: hospitals
 Intervention: acellular dermal matrix
Comparison: no graft
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No of participants
 (studies) Certainty of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Control Acellular dermal matrix
Incidence rate of Frey's syndrome assessed clinically
 Follow‐up: > 6 months 6 out of 15 0 out of 15 RR 0.08 
 (0.00 to 1.25) 30
 (1 studies) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 very low1 There were no events in the acellular dermal matrix group.
Other complications
As measured by clinical methods
Follow‐up: > 6 months
Wound infection 0 out of 32 8 out of 32 RR 17.00 
 (1.02 to 282.67) 64
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low1 There were no events in the control group.
Seroma/sialoceles 94 per 1000 218 per 1000
 (62 to 772) RR 2.33 
 (0.66 to 8.23) 64
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low1
Incidence rate of Frey's syndrome assessed by participants
Follow‐up: > 6 months
94 per 1000 31 per 1000
(0 to 288)
RR 0.33 
 (0.04 to 3.04) 64
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low1
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High certainty: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate certainty: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low certainty: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low certainty: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1Downgraded two levels due to serious imprecision (single study of 64 participants).
 2Downgraded two levels due to serious risk of bias.