Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 16;2019(12):CD004290. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004290.pub3

Summary of findings 5. Variable target of rapamycin inhibitor (TOR‐I) and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI): primary outcomes for primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients.

Variable TOR‐I and CNI: primary outcomes for primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients
Patient or population: primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients
 Setting: kidney transplant centres
 Intervention: lower dose TOR‐I and standard CNI
 Comparison: higher dose TOR‐I and reduced CNI
Outcomes (up to 2 years for primary outcomes) Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No. of participants
 (studies) Certainty of the evidence
 (GRADE)
Risk with higher dose TOR‐I Risk with low dose TOR‐I
Death (all causes) 39 per 1,000 41 per 1,000
 (25 to 69) RR 1.07
 (0.64 to 1.78) 1501 (9) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 MODERATE 1
Graft loss (censored) 36 per 1,000 39 per 1,000
 (19 to 79) RR 1.09
 (0.54 to 2.20) 1385 (8) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 MODERATE 1
Biopsy‐proven acute rejection 155 per 1,000 135 per 1,000
 (104 to 175) RR 0.87
 (0.67 to 1.13) 1381 (8) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 MODERATE 1
CMV infection 40 per 1,000 57 per 1,000
 (32 to 105) RR 1.42
 (0.78 to 2.60) 865 (5) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 MODERATE 2
Adverse wound outcomes: all complications 135 per 1,000 128 per 1,000
 (72 to 231) RR 0.95
 (0.53 to 1.71) 291 (3) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 LOW 3
All malignancies 15 per 1,000 16 per 1,000
 (5 to 46) RR 1.04
 (0.36 to 3.04) 1163 (7) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 LOW 1
Number needing to change treatment 186 per 1,000 219 per 1,000
 (108 to 450) RR 1.18
 (0.58 to 2.42) 734 (5) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 LOW 4
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 
 CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio; CMV: cytomegalovirus
GRADE Working Group grades of evidenceHigh certainty: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
 Moderate certainty: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
 Low certainty: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
 Very low certainty: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 Few events leading to wide confidence intervals

2 Few events in only five studies; wide confidence intervals

3 Only reported in three studies; wide confidence intervals

4 Significant heterogeneity