Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 16;2019(12):CD004290. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004290.pub3

2. Variable doses of target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR‐I) and calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and lower versus higher doses of TOR‐I: subgroup analysis of study methodology and design features for all acute rejection.

Variable Variable doses of TOR‐I and CNI* Lower versus higher doses of TOR‐I**
Studies RR (95% CI) P‐value
 for subgroup differences Studies RR (95% CI) P‐value
 for subgroup differences
Publication type
Abstract 2 RR 0.85 (95% CI 0.50 ‐ 1.46) 0.7 0 No studies Not applicable
Journal 7 RR 0.83 (95% CI 0.63 ‐ 1.08) 13 (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.41)
Risk of bias
Low risk 2 RR 0.85 (95% CI 0.50 ‐ 1.46) 0.81 5 (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.55) 0.10
High or unclear risk 7 RR 0.79 (95% CI 0.59 ‐ 1.06) 8 (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.33)
CNI co‐intervention
Tacrolimus 5 RR 0.77 (95% CI 0.51 ‐ 1.16) 0.67 3 (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.19) 0.06
Cyclosporin 4 RR 0.85 (95% CI 0.64 ‐ 1.14) 9 (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.35)
Antibody induction
No induction 6 RR 0.72 (95% CI 0.53 ‐ 0.98) 0.97 10 (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.45) 0.81
Antibody induction 3 RR 1.01 (95% CI 0.69 ‐ 1.46) 3 (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.62)
TOR‐I
Everolimus 2 (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.32) 0.4 7 (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.33) 0.09
Sirolimus 7 (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.03) 6 (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.66)

* Includes 9 studies, which reported the outcome of all acute rejection

** Includes 13 studies, which reported the outcome of all acute rejection