Cattaneo 2005.
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions | Treatment group 1
Treatment group 2
Co‐interventions
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "They were allocated to one of the following two study groups according to a randomization design" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "They were allocated to one of the following two study groups according to a randomization design" |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Open‐label study |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Primary outcome was MPA levels & these unlikely to be influenced by lack of blinding |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unclear whether all patients randomised were included in analyses |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Only GFR and SCr reported |
Other bias | Unclear risk | No report on funding |