Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 16;2019(12):CD004290. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004290.pub3

Durrbach 2008.

Methods
  • Design: open‐label RCT

  • Duration: 2002 to 2004

  • Follow up: 6 months

Participants
  • Setting: multicentre pilot study

  • Country: France

  • Kidney transplant recipients of extended criteria donors

  • Number (group 1/group 2): 72 randomised; 69 transplanted (33/36)

  • Mean age ± SD (years): group 1 (52.6 ± 11.2); group 2 (57.1 ± 8.9)

  • Sex (M/F): not reported

  • Exclusions: positive crossmatch; peak PRA > 50%; dual kidney allograft; donation after cardiac death

Interventions Treatment group 1
  • SRL: 15 mg in first 2 days post transplant & 10 mg daily for initial target 10 to 20 ng/mL; maintenance 10 to 20 ng/mL


Treatment group 2
  • CSA: 6 mg/kg/d for initial target 150 to 300 ng/mL at 3 months; 75 to 200 ng/mL at 6 months


Baseline immunosuppression
  • Steroids (prednisone or prednisolone)

  • MMF

  • ATG

Outcomes
  • Death (all causes)

  • Graft loss censored for death

  • Graft loss or death with a functioning graft

  • Acute rejection

  • SCr

Notes
  • Comparison: TOR‐I versus CNI

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Centrally randomised
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Centrally randomised
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Open‐label study
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Primary outcomes were patient/graft survival and these unlikely to be influenced by lack of blinding
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk All patients accounted for
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All prespecified primary outcomes reported
Other bias High risk Funded by Wyeth. EUDRACT trial number: 0468E1‐100969