Lo 2004.
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions | Treatment group 1
Treatment group 2
Co‐interventions
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Prospective, randomised, comparative pilot study. No details provided |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Prospective, randomised, comparative pilot study. No details provided |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Open‐label study |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The primary endpoint of the study was a composite of patient death, graft lost, or biopsy‐confirmed AR at 6 months post‐transplantation; unlikely to be influenced by lack of blinding |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All patients completed 6 months of study |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Limited information on adverse effects |
Other bias | High risk | Sponsored by Wyeth and SangStat |