Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 16;2019(12):CD004290. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004290.pub3

Morelon 2010.

Methods
  • Design: RCT

  • Duration: not reported

  • Mean follow‐up: 12 months

Participants
  • Setting: single centre

  • Country: France

  • Kidney transplant recipients aged 18 to 65 years; PRA < 20%; negative cross‐match; WBC > 4; platelets > 150; triglyceride < 4.5 mmol/L; cold ischaemia < 24 hours

  • Number (group 1/group 2): 19 (9/10)

  • Mean age ± SD (years): group 1 (42.6 ± 8.8); group 2 (51.1± 8.2)

  • Sex (M/F): group 1 (5/4); group 2 (1/9)

  • Exclusions: multiorgan transplant; previous malignancy; positive for HIV, HBV, HCV; infection at transplant; previous immunosuppression

Interventions Treatment group 1
  • SRL 15 mg/d on days 0 and 1; 10 mg/d on day 2; 5 mg/d on day 3 for levels 10 to 15 ng/mL

  • MMF: 2 g/d


Treatment group 2 (CSA)
  • CSA: 5 mg/kg for target 125 to 225 ng/mL

  • MMF: 2g/d


Co‐interventions
  • Prednisone

Outcomes
  • Death (all causes)

  • Acute rejection

  • Graft loss

  • Adverse effects

  • T cell parameters

Notes
  • Comparison: SRL versus CSA

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomised using sealed envelopes
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Randomised using sealed envelopes
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk open‐label study
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Outcomes of death/graft loss/AR unlikely to be influenced by lack of blinding
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk All patients accounted for
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk not all prespecified outcomes mentioned, limited information on adverse events
Other bias High risk Funded by Genzyme