Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 16;2019(12):CD004290. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004290.pub3

Sampaio 2008.

Methods
  • Design: open‐label RCT

  • Duration: 12 August 2003 to 04 March 2005

  • Mean follow‐up: 12 months

Participants
  • Setting: single centre

  • Country: Brazil

  • Participants: first kidney allograft, DD or LRD

  • Number (group 1/group 2): 100 (50/50)

  • Mean age ± SD (years): group 1 (42.6 ± 14.2); group 2 (37.4 ± 10.3)

  • Sex (M/F): group 1 (38/12); group 2 (31/19)

  • Exclusions: recipients of a kidney from non‐heart beating or ABO incompatible donors or with a positive crossmatch

Interventions Treatment group 1
  • MMF: 2 g/d

  • sTAC: 0.1 to 0.15 mg/ kg/d with levels 15 to 20 ng/mL (day 0 to 15); 10 to 15 ng/mL (days 15 to 30); 8 to 12 ng/mL (days 30 to 90); 5 to 10 ng/mL (> 90 days)


Treatment group 2 (SRL/sTAC)
  • SRL: 15 mg stat, 5 mg/d to day 7 and then 2 mg/d first year

  • sTAC: 0.1 to 0.15 mg/ kg/d with levels 15 to 20 ng/mL (day 0 to 15); 10 to 15 ng/mL (days 15 to 30); 8 to 12 ng/mL (days 30 to 90); 5 to 10 ng/mL (> 90 days)


Co‐interventions
  • Corticosteroids

  • Pneumocystis prophylaxis

  • No induction therapy

Outcomes
  • Composite end point ‐ first occurrence of BPAR, graft loss, death

  • Incidence of BPAR, severity of AR

  • Use of ATG graft loss, death and patient and graft survival censored for death

  • Safety outcomes: infections, malignancy, diabetes, hypercholesterolaemia

  • Kidney function: Cockcroft‐Gault formulae

Notes
  • Comparison: TOR‐1 versus MMF

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "randomised 1:1 using a computer generated sequence number"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomisation was computer generated but unclear whether sequence was known to investigators
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Open‐label study
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Primary outcomes unlikely to be influenced by lack of blinding
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk All patients accounted for
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All studies pre‐specified outcomes mentioned
Other bias High risk Grant sponsored by Jansen‐Cilag