Summary of findings 2. Acupuncture compared to usual care for induction of labour.
Acupuncture compared to usual care for induction of labour | ||||||
Patient or population: women due for third trimester induction of labour Setting: hospital ward/clinic Intervention: Acupuncture Comparison: usual care | ||||||
Outcomes | Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) | Relative effect (95% CI) | № of participants (studies) | Quality of the evidence (GRADE) | Comments | |
Risk with usual care | Risk with Acupuncture | |||||
Vaginal delivery not achieved within 24 hours ‐ not reported | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | No studies reported on this outcome |
Uterine hyperstimulation with FHR changes ‐ not reported | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | No studies reported on this outcome |
Caesarean section | Study population | average RR 0.77 (0.51 to 1.17) | 760 (8 RCTs) | ⊕⊕⊝⊝ LOW 1 2 | No evidence of benefit for acupuncture | |
211 per 1,000 | 162 per 1,000 (108 to 247) | |||||
Serious maternal morbidity or death ‐ not reported | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | No studies reported on this outcome |
Serious neonatal morbidity or death ‐ not reported | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | No studies reported on this outcome |
1 Downgraded one level: Three studies with high risk of bias in at least one domain of randomisation or blinding.
2 Downgraded one level: Substantial heterogeneity (I² = 42%).