Martinez 2004.
Methods | Acupuncture versus no treatment to examine the effect on uterine contractions. | |
Participants | The Obstetrics Outpatient Department of a university hospital in the Phillipines. 50 pregnant women who were term, singleton, not in labour, and with an uncomplicated course of pregnancy were included in the study. Exclusion criteria: women who were in the active phase of labour, who had previous caesarean section, PROM, concomitant medical illness, or allergy to metals, such as chromium or zinc. |
|
Interventions | Spleen 6 (point Sanyinjiao), on the lower leg approximately 3 inches proximal to the centre of the medial malleolus, was stimulated bilaterally. SP6 was pierced on both sides of the lower extremities. 2 minutes were allotted for each participant for the insertion of the acupuncture needle. The control group received no intervention. | |
Outcomes | The frequency, intensity, duration, and interval of uterine contractions were measured for 20 minutes. No outcomes relevant to the review were reported. | |
Notes | The trial did not report on any outcomes relevant to this review. Study duration January to November 2003 Funding: not reported Conflicts of Interest: not reported |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Partcipant and clinician not blinded |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Complete data, no losses |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Single outcome collected relating to uterine contractions |
Other bias | Low risk | No imbalance at randomisation |