Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 7;2019(11):CD013090. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013090.pub2

Comparison 1. Xiao Chai Hu Tang (XCHT) formula versus no intervention.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Proportion of participants with ≥ 1 adverse events considered 'not to be serious' – overall 2 240 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.43 [0.02, 11.98]
2 Proportion of participants with ≥ 1 adverse events considered 'not to be serious' – concomitant disease 2 240 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.43 [0.02, 11.98]
2.1 Participants diagnosed with only chronic hepatitis B 1 160 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.08 [0.00, 1.34]
2.2 Participants diagnosed with concomitant diseases 1 80 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.0 [0.19, 21.18]
3 Proportion of participants with detectable HBV‐DNA in serum or plasma – overall 3 222 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.62 [0.45, 0.85]
4 Proportion of participants with detectable HBV‐DNA in serum or plasma – incomplete data 3 222 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.62 [0.45, 0.85]
4.1 Trials at low risk of bias 2 143 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.49 [0.28, 0.87]
4.2 Trials at high risk of bias 1 79 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.69 [0.47, 1.01]
5 Proportion of participants with detectable HBV‐DNA in serum or plasma – formula type 3 222 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.62 [0.45, 0.85]
5.1 Experimental intervention with traditional XCHT formula 1 81 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.51 [0.28, 0.95]
5.2 Experimental intervention with modified XCHT formula 2 141 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.66 [0.45, 0.96]
6 Proportion of participants with detectable HBV‐DNA in serum or plasma – forms 3 222 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.62 [0.45, 0.85]
6.1 Water extraction of XCHT formula 2 143 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.49 [0.28, 0.87]
6.2 Granule of XCHT 1 79 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.69 [0.47, 1.01]
7 Proportion of participants with detectable HBV‐DNA in serum or plasma – duration 3 222 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.62 [0.45, 0.85]
7.1 Duration < 6 months 1 62 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.39 [0.09, 1.62]
7.2 Duration > 6 months 2 160 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.63 [0.46, 0.88]
8 Proportion of participants with detectable HBV‐DNA in serum or plasma – dosage 3 222 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.62 [0.45, 0.85]
8.1 XCHT < 15 g 2 141 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.66 [0.45, 0.96]
8.2 XCHT > 15 g 1 81 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.51 [0.28, 0.95]
9 Proportion of participants with detectable HBV‐DNA in serum or plasma – diagnostic criteria 3 222 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.62 [0.45, 0.85]
9.1 Participants with diagnostic criteria according to guidelines 2 141 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.66 [0.45, 0.96]
9.2 Participants with diagnosis by trialists 1 81 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.51 [0.28, 0.95]
10 Proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg in serum or plasma in fixed‐effect model – overall 2 160 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.70 [0.55, 0.91]
11 Proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg in serum or plasma in random‐effects model – overall 2 160 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.72 [0.50, 1.02]
12 Proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg in serum or plasma – incomplete data 2 160 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.72 [0.50, 1.02]
12.1 Trials at low risk of bias 1 81 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.56 [0.32, 0.97]
12.2 Trials at high risk of bias 1 79 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.80 [0.62, 1.03]
13 Proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg in serum or plasma – formula type 2 160 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.72 [0.50, 1.02]
13.1 Experimental intervention with traditional XCHT formula 1 81 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.56 [0.32, 0.97]
13.2 Experimental intervention with modified XCHT formula 1 79 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.80 [0.62, 1.03]
14 Proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg in serum or plasma – forms 2 160 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.72 [0.50, 1.02]
14.1 Water extraction of XCHT formula 1 81 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.56 [0.32, 0.97]
14.2 Granule of XCHT 1 79 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.80 [0.62, 1.03]
15 Proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg in serum or plasma – duration 2 160 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.72 [0.50, 1.02]
15.1 Duration < 6 months 1 79 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.80 [0.62, 1.03]
15.2 Duration > 6 months 1 81 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.56 [0.32, 0.97]
16 Proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg in serum or plasma – dosage 2 160 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.72 [0.50, 1.02]
16.1 XCHT < 15 g 1 79 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.80 [0.62, 1.03]
16.2 XCHT > 15 g 1 81 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.56 [0.32, 0.97]
17 Proportion of participants with nausea 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
18 Proportion of participants with nausea and vomiting 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
19 Proportion of participants with dizziness and sleep disorders 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
20 Proportion of participants with dizziness and fatigue 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
21 Proportion of participants with a dry feeling or bitter taste in the mouth 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
22 Proportion of participants with bloating and belching 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
23 Proportion of participants with loss of appetite 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected