Elgafor el Sharkwy 2013.
Study characteristics | |||
Patient sampling | Primary objective: to evaluate the diagnostic value of serum measurement of IL‐6 combined with the presence of nerve fibres in the functional layer of endometrium for diagnosis of minimal‐mild endometriosis Participants: women undergoing laparoscopy for infertility, pelvic pain or both Selection criteria: inclusion criteria: reproductive age, follicular phase of the cycle and regular menstrual cycle; exclusion criteria: any current infection, any medication within 1 month prior to laparoscopy, previous surgery for endometriosis and smoking or drinking alcohol Study design: observational, single‐gate, prospective recruitment and sample collection |
||
Patient characteristics and setting | Clinical presentation (n/N): infertility ‐ 91/114; dysmenorrhoea ‐ 64/114; dyspareunia ‐ 17/114; dyschezia ‐ 6/114; other pelvic pain ‐ 35/114 Age: mean age 29 ± 0.6 years, controls; 31 ± 1.1 years, endometriosis Number enrolled: 114 women Number available for analysis: 78 women (all in follicular cycle phase; only control and endometriosis stage I‐II were analysed) Setting: University hospital ‐ Zagazig University Hospital Place of study: Zagazig, Egypt Period of study: December 2010 to April 2012 Language: English |
||
Index tests | Index test: endometrial nerve fibres ‐ PGP 9.5 Description of positive case definition by index test as reported: presence of nerve fibres in the functional layer of endometrium, assessed by IHC staining for PGP 9.5 (an average of 4–5 sections per specimen were examined by using an Olympus microscope) Examiners: 2 pathologists, both of whom have good experience in nerve fibre identification Interobserver variability: close (96%) correlation between the 2 pathologists |
||
Target condition and reference standard(s) | Target condition: endometriosis Prevalence of target condition in the sample: n/N = 74/114 (65%): stage I‐II 38, stage III‐IV 36; controls 40 Reference standard: laparoscopy Description of positive case definition by reference test as reported: visualisation of the endometriotic lesions with surgical staging according to rASRM classification Examiners: 3 experienced gynaecologists in endometriosis |
||
Flow and timing | Time interval between index test and reference standard: endometrial biopsy was obtained prior to laparoscopy Withdrawals: data were not available for all women with advanced endometriosis (stage III‐IV), n = 36 |
||
Comparative | |||
Notes | Conclusion: Serum IL‐6 and nerve fibres in the functional layer of endometrium will both allow more accurate detection of women who are at risk of having early stages of endometriosis. Comment: The reported data on the serum marker or combination of serum‐endometrial marker are not presented in this review |
||
Methodological quality | |||
Item | Authors' judgement | Risk of bias | Applicability concerns |
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection | |||
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? | No | ||
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? | Yes | ||
Was a 'two‐gate' design avoided? | Yes | ||
High | High | ||
DOMAIN 2: Index Test All tests | |||
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? | Unclear | ||
If a threshold was used, was it pre‐specified? | Yes | ||
Was a menstrual cycle phase considered in interpreting the index test | Yes | ||
Unclear | Low | ||
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard | |||
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? | Yes | ||
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? | Yes | ||
Low | Low | ||
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing | |||
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? | Yes | ||
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? | Yes | ||
Were all patients included in the analysis? | No | ||
High |