Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 20;2016(4):CD012165. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012165

Liu 2008.

Study characteristics
Patient sampling Primary objective: to investigate the distribution of ER isoforms in endometriosis and eutopic endometrium
Participants: patients who underwent surgical treatment of ovarian endometrioma (study group) and total hysterectomy for cervical lesions in the authors' institution (controls)
Selection criteria: inclusion criteria: regular menstrual cycle and no history of hormonal therapy 6 months prior to surgery
Study design: cross‐sectional two‐gate, prospective collection of samples
Patient characteristics and setting Clinical presentation: not specified
Age: mean age 36 years (range 24‐49), endometriosis; 40 years (range 27‐46), controls
Number enrolled: 90 women
Number available for analysis: 90 women (45 in proliferative and 45 in secretory cycle phase)
Setting: university hospital: Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, affiliated to Peking Union Medical College
Place of study: Beijing, China
Period of study: January 2004 to December 2006
Language: Chinese
Index tests Index test: ER‐α and ER‐β
Description of positive case definition by index test as reported: positive expression of ER‐α and ER‐β was evaluated by IHC and classified by using Sinicrope Improved Semi‐quantitative Method (the percentage of stained cells and the intensity of staining was scored each by a 4 tier point system in each sliced section; both scores were added up and interpreted as: < 0.5 points means negative; 0.5‐1.5 points means weakly positive (+); 1.6‐2.5 points means averagely positive (++); > 2.5 points means strongly positive (+++).; laboratory technique described; threshold was not pre‐specified
Examiners: no information provided
Interobserver variability: not provided
Target condition and reference standard(s) Target condition: endometriosis
Prevalence of target condition in the sample: n/N = 60/90 (67%): stage not reported; controls 30
Reference standard: laparotomy/laparoscopy
Description of positive case definition by reference test as reported: no information provided
Examiners: no information provided
Flow and timing TIme interval between index test and reference standard: samples were taken at surgery
Withdrawals: none reported
Comparative  
Notes Conclusions: Both ER‐α and ER‐β have higher expression levels in eutopic endometrium of patients with ovarian endometriotic cysts. ER‐β is predominantly expressed in endometriotic cysts, whereas the expression of ER‐α is limited. The different distribution of ER‐α and ER‐β may play an important role in the development of ovarian endometriosis.
Comments:
The authors also report findings for endometriotic cysts; not included in this review
The authors also report findings for each cycle phase; not presented in this review
Methodological quality
Item Authors' judgement Risk of bias Applicability concerns
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? No    
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Yes    
Was a 'two‐gate' design avoided? No    
    High High
DOMAIN 2: Index Test All tests
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? Unclear    
If a threshold was used, was it pre‐specified? No    
Was a menstrual cycle phase considered in interpreting the index test Yes    
    High Low
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Unclear    
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? Yes    
    Unclear Low
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Yes    
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? Yes    
Were all patients included in the analysis? Yes    
    Low