Meibody 2011.
Study characteristics | |||
Patient sampling | Primary objective: to test the hypothesis that small demyelinated nerve fibres in functional layer of endometrium are present in higher density in women with endometriosis, which is more significant in secretory phase. Participants: women undergoing laparoscopy/laparotomy for infertility or pelvic pain Selection criteria: inclusion criteria: reproductive age, regular menstrual cycle; exclusion criteria: unwillingness to participate and use of hormonal medications for the past 3/12 months Study design: observational single‐gate, prospective collection of samples |
||
Patient characteristics and setting | Clinical presentation: chronic pelvic pain ‐ 23/27, dyspareunia ‐ 5/27, dysmenorrhoea ‐ 7/27, infertility ‐ 5/27 Age: mean age 39.5 ± 5.9 years, endometriosis; 41.6 ± 5.7 years, controls Number enrolled: 27 women Number available for analysis: 27 women (all in proliferative cycle phase) Setting: university hospital ‐ Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Rassoul Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences Place of study: Tehran, Iran Period of study: 2007‐2009 Language: English |
||
Index tests | Index test: endometrial small nerve fibres in eutopic endometrium ‐ PGP 9.5 Description of positive case definition by index test as reported: Presence of nerve fibres detected by IHC staining for PGP 9.5 seen in 10 HPF (IHC by using Dako Denmark A/S Produktionsej42 DK‐2600, Denmark and Olympus microscope; assessment of 3‐4 sections per slide; density of NF was also calculated by intensity of staining); laboratory technique described Examiners: pathologist was blinded to reference standard result Interobserver variability: not reported |
||
Target condition and reference standard(s) | Target condition: endometriosis Prevalence of target condition: n/N = 12/27 (44%): stage not reported; controls 15 Reference standard: Laparoscopy/laparotomy + histology Description of positive case definition by index test as reported: visualisation of the endometriotic lesions with surgical staging of the disease and histological confirmation Examiners: 3 experienced gynaecologists in endometriosis |
||
Flow and timing | Time interval between index test and reference standard: endometrial biopsy was obtained prior to surgery Withdrawals: none reported |
||
Comparative | |||
Notes | Conclusion: Assessment of neural fibre density in endometrial biopsy by PGP 9.5 staining is as accurate as surgical assessment by experienced gynaecologists. | ||
Methodological quality | |||
Item | Authors' judgement | Risk of bias | Applicability concerns |
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection | |||
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? | No | ||
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? | Yes | ||
Was a 'two‐gate' design avoided? | Yes | ||
High | Unclear | ||
DOMAIN 2: Index Test All tests | |||
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? | Yes | ||
If a threshold was used, was it pre‐specified? | Yes | ||
Was a menstrual cycle phase considered in interpreting the index test | Yes | ||
Low | Low | ||
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard | |||
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? | Yes | ||
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? | Yes | ||
Low | Low | ||
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing | |||
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? | Yes | ||
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? | Yes | ||
Were all patients included in the analysis? | Yes | ||
Low |