Acharya 2005.
Methods | FLUOROSIS STUDY Country of study: India Geographic location: Davangere‐Nallur, Naganur, Doddabathi, Kundawada and Holesirigere Year of study: not stated Year of change in fluoridation status: NA Study design: cross‐sectional | |
Participants | Inclusion criteria: school children aged 12‐15 years; lifetime residency Exclusion criteria: absence on the day of the survey Other sources of fluoride: not stated Social class: socioeconomic position was similar in all villages Ethnicity: not stated Residential history: lifetime residents Other confounding factors: not stated |
|
Interventions | All natural fluoridation Group 1: 0.43 ppm Group 2: 0.72 ppm Group 3: 1.1 ppm Group 4: 1.22 ppm Group 5: 3.41 ppm |
|
Outcomes | Dental fluorosis (Dean's Index) Age at assessment: 12‐15 years | |
Funding | Not stated | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Sampling | Unclear risk | 5 villages were selected out of a possible 90. There was insufficient detail reported to determine how selection took place |
Confounding | High risk | Did not account for use of other fluoride sources |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Insufficient information |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Data presented for all participants |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Outcome of interest reported |
Other bias | Low risk | No other apparent bias |