Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 18;2015(6):CD010856. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010856.pub2

Acharya 2005.

Methods FLUOROSIS STUDY 
 Country of study: India
 Geographic location: Davangere‐Nallur, Naganur, Doddabathi, Kundawada and Holesirigere
 Year of study: not stated
 Year of change in fluoridation status: NA
 Study design: cross‐sectional
Participants Inclusion criteria: school children aged 12‐15 years; lifetime residency
Exclusion criteria: absence on the day of the survey
Other sources of fluoride: not stated
Social class: socioeconomic position was similar in all villages
Ethnicity: not stated
Residential history: lifetime residents
Other confounding factors: not stated
Interventions All natural fluoridation
Group 1: 0.43 ppm
Group 2: 0.72 ppm
Group 3: 1.1 ppm
Group 4: 1.22 ppm
Group 5: 3.41 ppm
Outcomes Dental fluorosis (Dean's Index)
 Age at assessment: 12‐15 years
Funding Not stated
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Sampling Unclear risk 5 villages were selected out of a possible 90. There was insufficient detail reported to determine how selection took place
Confounding High risk Did not account for use of other fluoride sources
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Insufficient information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Data presented for all participants
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Outcome of interest reported
Other bias Low risk No other apparent bias