Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 18;2015(6):CD010856. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010856.pub2

Clarkson 1992.

Methods FLUOROSIS STUDY 
 Country of study: Ireland
Geographic location: Ireland
Year of study: 1984
Year of change in fluoridation status: 1964
Study design: cross‐sectional
Participants Inclusion criteria: children aged 8 and 15 years
Exclusion criteria: none stated
Other sources of fluoride: increase in use of fluoride‐containing toothpaste and infant formula made with fluoridated water
Social class: not stated
Ethnicity: not stated
Residential history: not stated
Other confounding factors: problems of consistent levels in the fluoridated supply during the 1960s and early 1970s
Interventions Group 1: 'optimal' level ‐ ppm not stated (artificial fluoridation)
 Group 2: 'low' level ‐ ppm not stated (natural fluoridation)
Outcomes Dental fluorosis (Deans Index); enamel defects (DDE)
Age at assessment: 8 and 15 years
Funding Not stated
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Sampling Low risk A stratified proportional random sampling procedure was used with size of school with fluoridation status and sex as stratifying factors
Confounding High risk Did not account for the use of other fluoride sources or SES
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Insufficient information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk The number of participants recruited was not reported and there was a variation in the number of children examined for enamel defects and children interviewed on perception of defects. It is not clear whether data were presented for all recruited participants
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Data not in suitable format for analysis
Other bias Low risk No other apparent bias