Clarkson 1992.
Methods |
FLUOROSIS STUDY
Country of study: Ireland Geographic location: Ireland Year of study: 1984 Year of change in fluoridation status: 1964 Study design: cross‐sectional |
|
Participants | Inclusion criteria: children aged 8 and 15 years Exclusion criteria: none stated Other sources of fluoride: increase in use of fluoride‐containing toothpaste and infant formula made with fluoridated water Social class: not stated Ethnicity: not stated Residential history: not stated Other confounding factors: problems of consistent levels in the fluoridated supply during the 1960s and early 1970s |
|
Interventions | Group 1: 'optimal' level ‐ ppm not stated (artificial fluoridation) Group 2: 'low' level ‐ ppm not stated (natural fluoridation) | |
Outcomes | Dental fluorosis (Deans Index); enamel defects (DDE) Age at assessment: 8 and 15 years |
|
Funding | Not stated | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Sampling | Low risk | A stratified proportional random sampling procedure was used with size of school with fluoridation status and sex as stratifying factors |
Confounding | High risk | Did not account for the use of other fluoride sources or SES |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Insufficient information |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | The number of participants recruited was not reported and there was a variation in the number of children examined for enamel defects and children interviewed on perception of defects. It is not clear whether data were presented for all recruited participants |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Data not in suitable format for analysis |
Other bias | Low risk | No other apparent bias |