McInnes 1982.
Methods |
FLUOROSIS STUDY Country of study: South Africa Geographic location: Kenhardt (F); Keimoes (non‐F); North‐western Cape Province Year of study: not stated Year of change in fluoridation status: NA Study design: cross sectional |
|
Participants | Inclusion criteria: lifetime residents of study area; pre‐school children aged 1‐5 years Exclusion criteria: none stated Other sources of fluoride: majority of babies were breastfed so would not be exposed to fluoride from water used in preparation of infant formula Social class: reported as being the same across groups; experimental and control groups reported as being similar (parents were land or railway labourers) Ethnicity: all children same ethnic origin i.e. European‐African‐Malay origin Residential history: lifetime residents Other confounding factors: same climatic conditions in both areas |
|
Interventions | All natural fluoridation Group 1: 2.2‐4.1 ppm Group 2: 0.2 ppm | |
Outcomes | Dental fluorosis (Dean's Index) Age at time of measurement: 1‐5 years |
|
Funding | Part funded by South African Sugar Association | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Sampling | Unclear risk | Insufficient detail reported to determine how selection took place |
Confounding | High risk | Malnutrition and SES were reported to be similar across groups but no supporting data provided Did not report any details about other sources of fluoride |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Did not undertake blinding |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Data appear to be presented for all participants |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All expected data appeared to be present |
Other bias | Low risk | No other apparent bias |