Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 18;2015(6):CD010856. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010856.pub2

McInnes 1982.

Methods FLUOROSIS STUDY
Country of study: South Africa
Geographic location: Kenhardt (F); Keimoes (non‐F); North‐western Cape Province
Year of study: not stated
Year of change in fluoridation status: NA
Study design: cross sectional
Participants Inclusion criteria: lifetime residents of study area; pre‐school children aged 1‐5 years
Exclusion criteria: none stated
Other sources of fluoride: majority of babies were breastfed so would not be exposed to fluoride from water used in preparation of infant formula
Social class: reported as being the same across groups; experimental and control groups reported as being similar (parents were land or railway labourers)
Ethnicity: all children same ethnic origin i.e. European‐African‐Malay origin
Residential history: lifetime residents
Other confounding factors: same climatic conditions in both areas
Interventions All natural fluoridation
 Group 1: 2.2‐4.1 ppm
 Group 2: 0.2 ppm
Outcomes Dental fluorosis (Dean's Index)
Age at time of measurement: 1‐5 years
Funding Part funded by South African Sugar Association
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Sampling Unclear risk Insufficient detail reported to determine how selection took place
Confounding High risk Malnutrition and SES were reported to be similar across groups but no supporting data provided
 Did not report any details about other sources of fluoride
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Did not undertake blinding
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Data appear to be presented for all participants
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All expected data appeared to be present
Other bias Low risk No other apparent bias