Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 18;2015(6):CD010856. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010856.pub2

Skinner 2013.

Methods FLUOROSIS STUDY
Country of study: Australia
Geographic location: New South Wales
Year of study: 2010
Year of change in fluoridation status: NA
Study design: cross‐sectional
Participants Inclusion criteria: school students aged 14‐15 years under the jurisdiction of the NSW Department of Education and Training, the Catholic Education Commission and Independent Schools
Exclusion criteria: not stated
Other sources of fluoride: not stated
Ethnicity: aboriginal status was coded from parental responses (not reported by fluoridation status)
Social class: self‐reported family income data were provided by parents or guardians and was used as a measure of SES (not reported by fluoridation status)
Residential history: not stated
Other confounding factors: not stated
Interventions Group 1: fluoridated (artificial; ppm not specified)
Group 2: non‐fluoridated
Outcomes Dental fluorosis (TF); caries data also evaluated within the study but excluded from review due to study design
Age at assessment: 14 and 15 years
Funding The Centre for Oral Health Strategy NSW
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Sampling Low risk Quote: "random sample"
Confounding Low risk Quote: "initial weights were adjusted to ensure the distribution of the sample reflected the regional population distribution of 14‐15‐year‐olds in NSW"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Insufficient information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Particpation rate low (23%). Did not account for all participants in analysis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Observed enamel fluorosis/defects were recorded for both the central incisors; not all data reported
Other bias Unclear risk No other apparent bias