Skinner 2013.
Methods |
FLUOROSIS STUDY Country of study: Australia Geographic location: New South Wales Year of study: 2010 Year of change in fluoridation status: NA Study design: cross‐sectional |
|
Participants | Inclusion criteria: school students aged 14‐15 years under the jurisdiction of the NSW Department of Education and Training, the Catholic Education Commission and Independent Schools Exclusion criteria: not stated Other sources of fluoride: not stated Ethnicity: aboriginal status was coded from parental responses (not reported by fluoridation status) Social class: self‐reported family income data were provided by parents or guardians and was used as a measure of SES (not reported by fluoridation status) Residential history: not stated Other confounding factors: not stated |
|
Interventions | Group 1: fluoridated (artificial; ppm not specified) Group 2: non‐fluoridated |
|
Outcomes | Dental fluorosis (TF); caries data also evaluated within the study but excluded from review due to study design Age at assessment: 14 and 15 years |
|
Funding | The Centre for Oral Health Strategy NSW | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Sampling | Low risk | Quote: "random sample" |
Confounding | Low risk | Quote: "initial weights were adjusted to ensure the distribution of the sample reflected the regional population distribution of 14‐15‐year‐olds in NSW" |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Insufficient information |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Particpation rate low (23%). Did not account for all participants in analysis |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Observed enamel fluorosis/defects were recorded for both the central incisors; not all data reported |
Other bias | Unclear risk | No other apparent bias |