Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 18;2015(6):CD010856. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010856.pub2

Szpunar 1988.

Methods FLUOROSIS STUDY
Country of study: USA
Geographic location: Hudson, Redford, Richmond (F); Cadillac (non‐F), Michigan
Year of study: not stated
Year of change in fluoridation status: not stated
Study design: cross‐sectional
Participants Inclusion criteria: lifetime residents of study areas; children aged 6‐12 years
Exclusion criteria: none stated
Other sources of fluoride: use of fluoride supplements; dental attendance; time interval since last dental visit; age began brushing (parent & child); age at start of F rinsing; feeding method in 1st year of life.
Social class: not stated
Ethnicity: not stated
Residential history: lifetime residents
Other confounding factors: not stated
Interventions Group 1: 1.2 ppm (artificial fluoridation)
 Group 2: 1.0 ppm (artificial fluoridation)
 Group 3: 0.8 ppm (artificial fluoridation)
 Group 4: 0.0 ppm (natural fluoridation)
Outcomes Dental fluorosis (TSIF); caries data also evaluated in the study but not included in the review due to study design
Age at assessment: 6‐12 years
Funding NIH National Research Service Award
Notes Data extracted from Szpunar 1988 differs from that presented in CRD review
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Sampling Unclear risk Classroom teachers distributed and collected permission slips
Confounding High risk Did not appear to account for the use of fluoride from other sources or SES
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Insufficient information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Data collected for 1103 participants but only lifetime resident data (n = 556) presented
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Relevant fluorosis outcome data
Other bias Low risk No other apparent risk of bias