Szpunar 1988.
Methods |
FLUOROSIS STUDY Country of study: USA Geographic location: Hudson, Redford, Richmond (F); Cadillac (non‐F), Michigan Year of study: not stated Year of change in fluoridation status: not stated Study design: cross‐sectional |
|
Participants | Inclusion criteria: lifetime residents of study areas; children aged 6‐12 years Exclusion criteria: none stated Other sources of fluoride: use of fluoride supplements; dental attendance; time interval since last dental visit; age began brushing (parent & child); age at start of F rinsing; feeding method in 1st year of life. Social class: not stated Ethnicity: not stated Residential history: lifetime residents Other confounding factors: not stated |
|
Interventions | Group 1: 1.2 ppm (artificial fluoridation) Group 2: 1.0 ppm (artificial fluoridation) Group 3: 0.8 ppm (artificial fluoridation) Group 4: 0.0 ppm (natural fluoridation) | |
Outcomes | Dental fluorosis (TSIF); caries data also evaluated in the study but not included in the review due to study design Age at assessment: 6‐12 years |
|
Funding | NIH National Research Service Award | |
Notes | Data extracted from Szpunar 1988 differs from that presented in CRD review | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Sampling | Unclear risk | Classroom teachers distributed and collected permission slips |
Confounding | High risk | Did not appear to account for the use of fluoride from other sources or SES |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Insufficient information |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Data collected for 1103 participants but only lifetime resident data (n = 556) presented |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Relevant fluorosis outcome data |
Other bias | Low risk | No other apparent risk of bias |