Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 18;2015(6):CD010856. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010856.pub2

Wang 1999.

Methods FLUOROSIS STUDY
Country of study: China
Geographic location: Xindiliang Village (high F), Shiligetu Village (lower F)
Year of study: 1999
Year of change in fluoridation status: NA
Study design: cross sectional study
Participants Inclusion criteria: not stated
Exclusion criteria: not stated
Other sources of fluoride: not stated
Social class: not stated
Ethnicity: not stated
Residential history: not stated
Other confounding factors: not stated
Interventions All natural fluoridation
Group 1: 1.3 ppm
Group 2: 2‐4 ppm
Outcomes Dental fluorosis and skeletal fluorosis (3 grade classification for both)
Age at assessment: all ages
Funding Japan International Cooperation Agency
Notes Removal of fluoride from the water in these areas was attempted in the 1980s but failed to be applied continuously
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Sampling Unclear risk Households in the villages of study were arbitrarily chosen so that 25% were included in the study
Confounding High risk Did not account for the use of fluoride from other sources
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Insufficient information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Data presented for all participants
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Outcome of interest presented
Other bias High risk There was no mention of examiner calibration