Wang 1999.
Methods |
FLUOROSIS STUDY Country of study: China Geographic location: Xindiliang Village (high F), Shiligetu Village (lower F) Year of study: 1999 Year of change in fluoridation status: NA Study design: cross sectional study |
|
Participants | Inclusion criteria: not stated Exclusion criteria: not stated Other sources of fluoride: not stated Social class: not stated Ethnicity: not stated Residential history: not stated Other confounding factors: not stated |
|
Interventions | All natural fluoridation Group 1: 1.3 ppm Group 2: 2‐4 ppm |
|
Outcomes | Dental fluorosis and skeletal fluorosis (3 grade classification for both) Age at assessment: all ages |
|
Funding | Japan International Cooperation Agency | |
Notes | Removal of fluoride from the water in these areas was attempted in the 1980s but failed to be applied continuously | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Sampling | Unclear risk | Households in the villages of study were arbitrarily chosen so that 25% were included in the study |
Confounding | High risk | Did not account for the use of fluoride from other sources |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Insufficient information |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Data presented for all participants |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Outcome of interest presented |
Other bias | High risk | There was no mention of examiner calibration |