Velayutham 2014.
| Methods |
Study design: randomized, open‐label, parallel‐group, 5‐arm, active‐controlled trial Study period: patient recruitment commenced in May 2007 (interim results of an ongoing trial) Recruitment sites: Chennai, Madurai Country where the trial was undertaken: India Length of follow‐up: 24 months after treatment completion |
|
| Participants |
No. of participants randomized: 801 (of the 1650 anticipated) Combined intervention arms: 3 to 4 months moxifloxacin: N = 629 Control: 6 months ATT: N = 172 Age: < 35 years: moxifloxacin 52%; control 52% Gender: male: moxifloxacin 74%; control 77% Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Proportion with HIV seropositivity: nil (excluded) Proportion with cavitation: moxifloxacin 36%; control 41% Baseline drug resistance: isoniazid (moxifloxacin 7%; control 8%); ofloxacin (moxifloxacin 5%; control 7%); rifampicin, ethambutol, isoniazid, and ethambutol; isoniazid and ofloxacin (< 1% in both groups) |
|
| Interventions |
Interventions: 3‐ and 4‐month moxifloxacin regimens: moxifloxacin added to standard ATT drugs N = 629 randomized; 13 exclusions; 616 (98%) evaluated of those randomized
Control (6‐month regimen): N = 172 randomized: 8 exclusions; 164 (95%) evaluated of those randomized
Dosage: rifampicin 450 (< 60 kg) or 600 mg (> 60 kg); isoniazid 300 mg (daily) and 600 mg (thrice weekly); pyrazinamide 1500 mg; ethambutol 800 mg (daily) and 1200 mg (thrice weekly); moxifloxacin 400 mg |
|
| Outcomes |
Outcomes reported and used in this review:
Outcomes sought for the review but not reported:
|
|
| Notes |
Funding: Indian Council of Medical Research Follow‐up method: over the 24‐month follow‐up period, participants had monthly clinical examination and adherence and adverse events recording; monthly sputum microscopy and culture (and on days 15 and 45) and monthly drug susceptibility testing for 1 positive culture; monthly ECG, haemogram, liver and kidney functions, random blood sugars, and HIV ELISA tests. Chest X‐ray after the 2‐month intensive phase. Adverse events were assessed monthly for the duration of treatment (3 to 6 months) Treatment supervision: during the daily phase, treatment was under direct observation on 5 of 7 days of the week, whereas 2 doses were self‐administered. All thrice‐weekly phase doses were directly observed. Patients who missed treatment visits were visited at home and were motivated to attend the clinic for treatment Trial registration ID: CTRI 2008/091/000024 (retrospectively registered on 09/05/2008) Comment: results for sputum conversion at 2 months presented are the combined results of the 4 moxifloxacin regimens. Results for adverse events include up to the end of the 3‐ or 4‐month moxifloxacin regimens and over 6 months in the control regimen |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote from report: "Restricted random allocation sequences generated using random number tables,separately for the 6 strata, were used to assign the regimens" |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote from trial registration document: "Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes" |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | This was an open‐label study but all treatment arms had supervised treatment and scheduled assessments for efficacy and safety outcomes |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The outcomes reported are sputum culture results at 2 months and drug adverse events that were assessed for all participants at specified time points. Sputum culture results and ECG reports are objective outcomes, and the likelihood of detection bias influencing the reporting of other adverse events is low |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias): At the end of ATT (Treatment failure, positive sputum culture, treatment discontinuation, adverse events) | Low risk | 590 of 616 (96%) on moxifloxacin regimens and 151 of 162 (93%) on the control regimen had sputum cultures reported at 2 months. The 3% differential attrition is unlikely to have influenced the difference in proportions with negative sputum cultures at 2 months of 14.6% (95% CI 8.8% to 21.8%) |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias): At the end of follow‐up (Relapse, deaths) | Low risk | Not reported, as the trial is ongoing and this report includes only interim outcomes |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | This is an interim report of an ongoing trial. The outcomes presented were pre‐stated in the trial registration document |
| Other bias | Low risk | No other sources of bias were detected |
Abbreviations: ALT: alanine aminotransferase; ART: antiretroviral therapy; ARV: antiretroviral; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; ATT: anti‐tuberculosis treatment; CrCl: creatinine clearance; DM: diabetes mellitus; DMID: Division of Microbiology and Infectious Disease; ECG: electrocardiogram; ELISA: enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay; IUCD: intrauterine contraceptive device; M tuberculosis: Mycobacterium tuberculosis; MDR‐TB: multi‐drug‐resistant tuberculosis; NIDDM: non‐insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus; WHO: World Health Organization.