Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 26;2019(11):CD009286. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009286.pub3

Dam 1996.

Methods Parallel design
Analysis: per protocol: withdrawn because of AEs (2 treatment), all excluded from analysis
Participants Location: Italy
Setting: unclear
Treatment: 18 people, mean ± SD age 68 ± 9 years, 44% men
Control: 17 people, mean ± SD age 68 ± 5.5 years, 44% men
Stroke criteria: ischaemic, unilateral MCA territory stroke, diagnosis via clinical signs and CT (100%), stroke 1 to 6 months prior to randomisation (average time 3 months)
Other inclusion criteria: unable to walk
Comparability of treatment groups: balanced
Exclusion: history of major affective disorders; alcohol abuse; or a history or evidence or both of severe heart, lung, kidney or liver diseases or mental deterioration
Interventions Treatment: fluoxetine 20 mg daily
Control: matched placebo
Duration: treatment continued on average 74 ± 6 days, duration not reported for control group
Duration of follow‐up (treatment end to study end): 0
Outcomes Depression: change in scores from baseline to end of treatment on HDRS
Additional: graded neurological scale (HSS), BI
Leaving the study early
Death
AEs including seizures ‐ unclear if these were reported systematically
Funding source Funding source not stated
Notes Dates of recruitment and conflicts of interest not stated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk No description
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No description
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "Examining neurologists blind to treatment".
Comment: Unclear if this refers to outcome assessors or the neurologist caring for the participant. However, placebo was 'matched' so this is low risk
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk See above
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk 2/35 dropouts, per‐protocol analysis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Trial available, including results on www.strokecentre.org/trials ‐ all specified outcome measures were reported
Other bias Unclear risk Baseline characteristics similar in the 2 groups