Wen 2006.
Methods | Parallel trial Aim: to explore effects of prophylactic antidepression therapy on nerve functional rehabilitation after stroke Analysis: according to treatment group |
|
Participants | Country: China Setting: inpatient Stroke criteria: acute stroke of all pathological subtypes, clinical diagnosis plus confirmation by imaging (although not clear whether a stroke lesion had to be present) Treatment: 42 people, mean age 56.8 years, men 19 Control: 42 people, mean age 57.2 years, men 16 Excluded those with primary psychiatric impairment and premorbid mood disorders, pre‐existing neurological disease causing confusion, severe systematic diseases and pulmonary, hepatic and renal failure |
|
Interventions | Treatment: fluoxetine 20 mg daily plus routine stroke care Control: routine stroke care Duration of treatment: 8 weeks Duration of follow‐up (end of treatment to end of study): 0 |
|
Outcomes | HAMD MESSS AEs (method of obtaining data not stated) Death |
|
Funding source | Source of funding not stated | |
Notes | − | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | No placebo |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not described |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Analysed according to treatment group, no dropouts |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No protocol |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Balanced baseline |