Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 26;2019(11):CD009286. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009286.pub3

Zhou 2008.

Methods Aim: to study effect of early paroxetine on post‐stroke depression and rehabilitation
Parallel design
Analysis: according to treatment groups
Participants Country: China
Setting: inpatient
Stroke criteria: all stroke, clinical diagnosis plus confirmation by imaging (though not clear if a relevant stroke lesion had to be visible), stroke onset time ≤ 7 days, no obvious cognitive impairment, no obvious aphasia
HAMD score < 8
Treatment: 36 people, mean age 63 ± 9.3 years, 16 men
Control: 40 people, mean age 61 ± 9.6 years, 19 men
Excluded: previous psychiatric disorders, severe hepatic and renal impairment, taking agents with obvious interaction with fluoxetine in recent 1 month
Interventions Treatment: fluoxetine 20 mg daily plus acute stroke routine medication
Control: acute stroke routine medication
Duration of treatment: 8 weeks
Duration of follow‐up: 0
Outcomes No raw data provided for any of the following outcomes: diagnosis of depression (CCMD‐3, HAMD, ADL, MESSS)
Reported no deaths in either group. Unclear how data on side effects were collected
Funding source Source of funding not stated
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Method not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No placebo
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not described
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No dropouts, analysed according to allocated treatment group
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk No protocol, no raw data provided for several of the outcomes
Other bias Low risk Baseline similar

ADL: activities of daily livingAE: adverse events; AE: adverse event; BDI: Beck Depression Inventory; BI: Barthel Index; CCMD‐II‐R: Chinese Classification of Mental Disorders, second edition, revised; CCMD‐3: Chinese Classification of Mental Disorders‐3; CGI: Clinical Global Impressions Scale; CSS: Chinese Stroke Scale; CT: computerised tomography; CTIMP: Clinical Trial of an Investigational Medical Product; EEG: electroencephalogram; FAI: Frenchay Activities Index; FAST: Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test; FIM: Functional Independence Measure; FMMS: Fugl‐Meyer Motor Scale; fMRI: functional magnetic resonance imaging; GDS: Geriatric Depression Scale; GI: gastrointestinal; HADS: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; HAMA: Hamilton Anxiety scales; HAMD/HDRS: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; HSS: Hemispheric Stroke Scale; ICD: International Classification of Diseases; ICH: intracerebral haemorrhage; IL: interleukin; ITT: intention‐to‐treat; IQR: interquartile range; JHFI: Johns Hopkins Functioning Inventory; LOCF: last‐observation‐carried‐forward; MADRS: Montgomery‐Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; MAOI: mono‐amino‐oxidase inhibitor; MCA: middle cerebral artery; MEP: motor evoked potentials; MESSS: Modified Edinburgh‐Scandinavian Stroke Scale; MMSE: Mini‐Mental State Examination; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; mRS: modified Rankin score; NIHSS: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; PASE: Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly; PICH: primary intracerebral haemorrhage; RS: Rankin score; SAH: subarachnoid haemorrhage; SAS: Zung Self‐rating Anxiety Scale; SD: standard deviation; SDS: Zung Self‐rating Depression Scale; SF‐36: Short Form‐36; SSS: Scandinavian Stroke Scale; TESS: Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale; TIA: transient ischaemic attack; WHO: World Health Organization