Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 26;2019(11):CD009286. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009286.pub3

Karimialavijeh 2017.

Trial name or title Comparison of the effects of citalopram versus fluoxetine on motor recovery after stroke: a double‐blind placebo‐controlled randomised clinical trial
Methods Study type: interventional (clinical trial)
Estimated enrolment: 90 participants
Allocation: randomised
Intervention model: parallel assignment
Masking: unclear
Primary purpose: treatment
Participants Iran (Islamic Republic of Iran)
Inclusion criteria:
  • Age > 18 years

  • First‐time acute (in the past 24 hours) ischaemic stroke

  • hemiparesis or hemiplegia

  • FMMS score < 55


Exclusion criteria:
  • NIHSS score < 5

  • Existing impairments including stroke‐related aphasia, cognitive or motor disorders, or other neurodegenerative disease

  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding

  • Using antidepressant medication

  • Contraindications of therapy (e.g. renal insufficiency abnormal liver function tests)

  • Signifcant adverse effects (e.g. agitation, hypertension) as a consequence of treatment

Interventions Experimental: 20 mg of fluoxetine orally, daily for 90 days, as well as physiotherapy sessions 1 hour a day, 5 days a week, for 12 weeks
Comparator 1: 20 mg of citalopram orally, daily for 90 days, as well as physiotherapy sessions 1 hour a day, 5 days a week, for 12 weeks
Comparator 2: capsules containing microcrystalline cellulose, orally, daily for 90 days, as well as physiotherapy sessions 1 hour a day, 5 days a week, for 12 weeks
Outcomes Primary outcome collected at 90 days
  • Motor function (FMMS score)

Starting date 3 December 2017
Contact information Ehsan Karimialavijeh
Dr Shariati hospital, North Karegar Ave1411713135
Tehran Iran (Islamic Republic of)
drkarimi86@gmail.com
Notes IRCT20141116019971N3