Skip to main content
. 2018 May 15;2018(5):CD004829. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004829.pub4

Summary of findings 7. Conscious sedation and analgesia (CSA) + paracervical block (PCB) versus PCB.

Conscious sedation and analgesia (CSA) plus paracervical block (PCB) compared with PCB only for women undergoing oocyte retrieval for assisted reproduction
Patient or population: women undergoing oocyte retrieval for assisted reproduction
 Setting: assisted reproduction clinic
 Intervention: CSA + PCB
 Comparison: PCB only
Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No. of participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Risk with PCB only Risk with CSA + PCB
(95% CI)
Intraoperative pain No studies reported this outcome. Not estimable
Postoperative pain No studies reported this outcome. Not estimable
Pregnancy 253 per 1000 240 per 1000
(130 to 399)
OR 0.93
(0.44 to 1.96)
150
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 LOWa  
Patient satisfaction 800 per 1000 867 per 1000 OR 1.63
(0.68 to 3.89)
150
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 LOWa  
Side effects (postoperative vomiting and/or vomiting) No studies reported this outcome Not estimable  
Postoperative complications No studies reported this outcome Not estimable  
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio; RCT: randomised controlled trial.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence.High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
 Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
 Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
 Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aDowngraded two levels for very serious imprecision: low event rates and wide confidence intervals compatible with benefit in either group or no effect.