Ben‐Shlomo 1999.
Methods | Randomisation: random numbers Allocation concealment: sealed in consecutive envelopes Blinding of participants/investigators: no Blinding of assessors: no No. randomised: 50 No. analysed: 50 Intention‐to‐treat analysis: yes Power and sample calculations not described Duration of trial: not stated |
|
Participants | Women scheduled for oocyte retrieval Mean age: 34 years; cause of infertility not reported Similar baseline characteristics of age, height, and weight |
|
Interventions |
No premedication in either group |
|
Outcomes |
Other outcomes reported: no. of oocytes retrieved, cleavage rate, arousability, response to painful stimuli |
|
Notes | Israel Single centre HaEmek Mecical Centre Funding: not stated Definition of pregnancy not documented |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Random numbers |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Adequate: sealed envelopes |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Blinding not possible because of the nature of the interventions Blinding of assessors not reported |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No apparent dropout |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All pre‐stated outcomes reported |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Comparable baseline characteristics of age, height, and weight but not cause of infertility |