Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 5;2019(12):CD011260. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011260.pub2

Comparison 3. IPV(3)‐OPV versus IPV(2)‐OPV.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Persons with polio protective humoral response 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 P1 protective humoral response 1 137 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.93, 1.03]
1.2 P2 protective humoral response 1 137 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.0 [0.97, 1.03]
1.3 P3 protective humoral response 1 137 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.01 [0.97, 1.05]