Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 5;2019(12):CD011260. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011260.pub2

Modlin 1997.

Methods Study design: open‐label, randomised trial
Setting: 3 Baltimore area paediatric practices, USA
Study dates: 1991 to 1993
Participants Sample size: 510 infants
Dropouts/withdrawals: 101* (42* due to relocation or change of physician, 34* due to noncompliance with study visits, 28* due to parental request)
Age: Not reported
Sex: male = 266, female = 244
Inclusion criteria: not reported
Exclusion criteria: not reported
Interventions Group A (n = 102): IIO at 2, 4, 15 months
Group B (n = 105): IIOO at 2, 4, 6, 15 months
Group C (n = 101): I (I + O) OO at 2, 4, 6, 15 months
Group D (n = 99): III at 2, 4, 15 months
Group E (n = 103): OOO at 2, 4, 15 months
Outcomes
  • Humoral immune response

  • Gastrointestinal mucosal immunity


Timing of outcome assessment: 2, 6, 15, 18 months
Notes *Exact figures taken from study report
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Infants were assigned by the Moses‐Oakford randomization algorithm"
Quote: "There were no meaningful differences among the study groups in sex, race, mean age at each study visit, or withdrawal rate (data not shown)."
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: not described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: no blinding but performance is not likely to be influenced by lack of blinding in terms of intervention or co‐interventions
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: no blinding but objective outcome (antibody titres) is not likely to be influenced by lack of blinding
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Quote: "Of the subjects, 101 (20%) withdrew from the study before the 18month visit."
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: no evidence of selecting reporting
Other bias Low risk Comment: no evidence of other bias
Conflict of interest Unclear risk Comment: financially supported by Connaught Laboratories, Inc, Swiftwater, Pennsylvania (now Pasteur‐Merieux‐Connaught); National Immunization Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta