Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 19;2019(11):CD012487. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012487.pub2

Summary of findings 2. Treadmill workstation compared to no intervention for increasing standing or walking for decreasing musculoskeletal symptoms in sedentary workers.

Treadmill workstation compared to no intervention for increasing standing or walking for decreasing musculoskeletal symptoms in sedentary workers
Patient or population: sedentary workers with musculoskeletal symptoms
 Setting: office setting
 Intervention: treadmill workstation
 Comparison: no intervention
Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) № of participants
 (studies) Certainty of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Risk with no intervention Risk with treadmill workstation
Proportion of participants with low back pain/discomfort follow‐up short‐term 714 per 1000 750 per 1000
 (357 to 1000) RR 1.05
 (0.50 to 2.19) 11
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 Lowa,b  
Proportion of participants with neck pain/discomfort follow‐up short‐term 571 per 1000 714 per 1000
 (320 to 1000) RR 1.25
 (0.56 to 2.77) 14
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 Lowa,b  
Proportion of participants with shoulder pain/discomfort follow‐up short‐term 667 per 1000 753 per 1000
 (340 to 1000) RR 1.13
 (0.51 to 2.50) 10
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 Lowa,b  
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 
 CI: confidence interval; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence.High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
 Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
 Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
 Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aConcerns about blinding of participants and personnel, loss to follow‐up and baseline imbalance; downgraded one level.

bLow number of participants and wide confidence intervals; downgraded one level.