Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 19;2019(11):CD012487. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012487.pub2

Comparison 2. Treadmill workstation versus no intervention.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Proportion of participants with low back pain/discomfort follow‐up short‐term 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2 Proportion of participants with upper back pain/discomfort follow‐up short‐term 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3 Proportion of participants with neck pain/discomfort follow‐up short‐term 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
4 Proportion of participants with shoulder pain/discomfort follow‐up short‐term 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5 Proportion of participants with elbow/wrist/hand pain/discomfort follow‐up short‐term 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6 Proportion of participants with knee pain/discomfort follow‐up short‐term 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected