Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 25;2018(2):CD004982. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004982.pub6

Comparison 35. Desmin intramuscular (im) 200 versus desmin 100.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Adverse events 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2 Adverse drug reactions 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected