Table 1.
Country/region | Age-dependent ITs | Major osteoporotic fracture IT (fixed) | Hip fracture IT (fixed) | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
China | – | 4.0% | 1.3% | 32 |
Hong Kong | – | 9.95% | – | 33 |
India | 2.8%–17% (major fracture) | – | 28 | |
Japan | 5%–20% (major fracture) | 15%, 10.5% | – | 34–36 |
Malaysia | – | NOF cutoff values | NOF cutoff values | 37 |
Philippines | – | NOF cutoff values | NOF cutoff values | 38 |
Singaporea | 2.9%–28% (major) 0.6%–1.4% (hip) |
4% | 1% | 27 |
Sri Lanka | 2.7%–18.6% (major) 0.4%–7.1% (hip) |
9% | 3% | 24 |
b15%–18.6% for major and 4.7%–7.1% for hip fracture for 70 and above) | 6% (below 70 yr) | 2% (below 70 yr) | ||
– | c6% (below 70 yr) | 2% (below 70 yr) | ||
– | 12% (70 and above) | 5% (70 and above) | ||
Taiwan | 15% | 7% | 29 | |
Thailand | – | 3% | 40 |
FRAX, fracture risk assessment tool; IT, intervention threshold; NOF, National Osteoporosis Foundation.
Mean weighted values adjusted for population composition.
Hybrid intervention thresholds.
Two-tier intervention thresholds.