Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 16;5(4):104–108. doi: 10.1016/j.afos.2019.12.002

Table 1.

FRAX-based intervention thresholds recommended/used in Asia.

Country/region Age-dependent ITs Major osteoporotic fracture IT (fixed) Hip fracture IT (fixed) References
China 4.0% 1.3% 32
Hong Kong 9.95% 33
India 2.8%–17% (major fracture) 28
Japan 5%–20% (major fracture) 15%, 10.5% 34–36
Malaysia NOF cutoff values NOF cutoff values 37
Philippines NOF cutoff values NOF cutoff values 38
Singaporea 2.9%–28% (major)
0.6%–1.4% (hip)
4% 1% 27
Sri Lanka 2.7%–18.6% (major)
0.4%–7.1% (hip)
9% 3% 24
b15%–18.6% for major and 4.7%–7.1% for hip fracture for 70 and above) 6% (below 70 yr) 2% (below 70 yr)
c6% (below 70 yr) 2% (below 70 yr)
12% (70 and above) 5% (70 and above)
Taiwan 15% 7% 29
Thailand 3% 40

FRAX, fracture risk assessment tool; IT, intervention threshold; NOF, National Osteoporosis Foundation.

a

Mean weighted values adjusted for population composition.

b

Hybrid intervention thresholds.

c

Two-tier intervention thresholds.