Skip to main content
. 2019 May 10;28(2):531–540. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04838-6

Table 2.

Impact of TNF-α genotypes on the risk of more severe oral mucositis after subsequent cycles of RTH

RTH cycle Radiation reaction grade CC (n = 6; %) TT or CT p, OR [95% CI] TT (n = 37; %) CC or CT p, OR [95% CI] CT (n = 19; %) CC or TT p, OR [95%CI]
1 0 (n = 6; 9.7%) 6 (100%)

0.736

1.673 [0.084–33.281]

5 (83.3%) 1 (16.7%)

0.241

3.750 [0.411–34.230]

1 (16.7%) 5 (83.3%)

0.446

2.368 [0.258–21.787]

1 (n = 56; 90.3%) 6 (10.7%) 50 (89.3%) 32 (57.1%) 24 (42.9%) 18 (32.1%) 38 (67.9%)
2 1 (n = 36; 58%) 2 (5.6%) 34 (94.4%)

0.214

3.091 [0.521–18.331]

23 (63.9%) 13 (36.1%)

0.427

1.517 [0.542–4.240]

11 (30.6%) 25 (69.4%)

0.930

1.051 [0.353–3.128]

2 (n = 26; 42%) 4 (15.4%) 22 (84.6%) 14 (53.8%) 12 (46.2%) 8 (30.8%) 18 (69.2%)
3 1 (n = 21; 33.9%) 1 (4.8%) 20 (95.2%)

0.366

2.778 [0.303–25.463]

14 (66.6%) 7 (33.3%)

0.424

1.565 [0.523–4.689]

6 (28.6%) 15 (71.4%)

0.800

1.161 [0.367–3.676]

2 and 3 (n = 41; 66.1%) 5 (12.2%) 36 (87.8%) 23 (56.1%) 18 (43.9%) 13 (31.7%) 28 (68.3%)
1 and 2 (n = 55; 88.7%) 5 (%) 50 (%)

0.664

1.667 [0.166–16.758]

35 (63.6%) 20 (36.4%)

0.094

4.374 [0.776–24.664]

15 (27.3%) 40 (72.7%)

0.123

3.556 [0.711–17.793]

3 (n = 7; 11.3%) 1 (9.1%) 6 (90.9%) 2 (28.6%) 5 (71.4%) 4 (57.1%) 3 (42.9%)
4 1 (n = 11; 17.7%) 11 (100%)

0.429

3.286 [0.172–62.673]

9 (81.8%) 2 (18.2%)

0.116

3.696 [0.725–18.837]

2 (18.2%) 9 (81.8%)

0.332

2.250 [0.437–11.589]

2 and 3 (n = 51; 82.3%) 6 (11.8%) 45 (88.2%) 28 (64.9%) 23 (45.1%) 17 (33.3%) 34 (66.7%)
1 and 2 (n = 49; 79%) 4 (8.2%) 45 (91.8%)

0.441

2.045 [0.331–12.636]

32 (65.3%) 17 (34.7%)

0.090

3.012 [0.852–10.647]

13 (26.5%) 36 (73.5%)

0.179

2.374 [0.672–8.380]

3 (n = 13; 21%) 2 (15.4%) 11 (84.6%) 5 (38.5%) 8 (61.5%) 6 (46.2%) 7 (53.8%)
5 1 (n = 6; 9.7%) 6 (100%)

0.736

1.673 [0.084–33.281]

6 (100%)

0.115

10.524 [0.566–195.81]

6 (100%)

0.200

6.760 [0.362–126.36]

2 and 3 (n = 56; 90.3%) 6 (10.7%) 50 (89.3%) 31 (65.4%) 25 (44.6%) 19 (33.9%) 37 (66.1%)
1 and 2 (n = 48; 77.4%) 4 (8.3%) 44 (91.7%)

0.512

1.833 [0.299–11.241]

31 (64.6%) 17 (35.4%)

0.151

2.431 [0.723–8.175]

13 (27.1%) 35 (72.9%)

0.265

2.019 [0.587–6.944]

3 (n = 14; 22.6%) 2 (14.3%) 12 (85.7%) 6 (42.9%) 8 (57.1%) 6 (42.9%) 8 (57.1%)
6 1 (n = 7; 11.3%) 7 (100%)

0.655

1.970 [0.100–38.673]

7 (100%)

0.089

12.541 [0.683–230.37]

7 (100%)

0.162

8.014 [0.434–147.85]

2 and 3 (n = 55; 88.7%) 6 (10.9%) 49 (89.1%) 30 (54.5%) 25 (45.5%) 19 (34.5%) 36 (65.5%)
1 and 2 (n = 46; 74.2%) 2 (4.3%) 44 (95.7%)

0.031*

7.333 [1.196–44.965]

28 (60.9%) 18 (39.1%)

0.746

1.210 [0.283–3.827]

16 (34.8%) 30 (65.2%)

0.239

2.311 [0.573–9.319]

3 (n = 16; 25.8%) 4 (25%) 12 (75%) 9 (56.2%) 7 (43.8%) 3 (18.8%) 13 (81.2%)
7 1 (n = 8; 12.9%) 8 (100%)

0.587

2.278 [0.117–44.294]

8 (100%)

0.069

14.695 [0.808–267.35]

8 (100%)

0.132

9.338 [0.511–170.60]

2 and 3 (n = 54; 87.1%) 6 (11.1%) 48 (88.9%) 29 (53.7%) 25 (46.3%) 19 (35.2%) 35 (64.8%)
1 and 2 (n = 36; 58.1%) 36 (100%)

0.035*

23.146 [1.240–432.14]

28 (77.8%) 8 (22.2%)

0.001*

6.611 [2.142–20.405]

8 (22.2%) 28 (77.8%)

0.100

2.567 [0.849–7.755]

3 (n = 26; 41.9%) 6 (23.1%) 20 (76.9%) 9 (34.6%) 17 (65.4%) 11 (42.3%) 15 (57.7%)

OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval, *Statistically significant values