Table 4.
Methods | Zebrafish (Danio rerio) |
Chicken (Gallus gallus) |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | F-measure | Kappa | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | F-measure | Kappa | |
CPC | 0.6728 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.5784 | 0.9888 | 0.7836 | 0.7277 | 0.5671 |
CPAT | 0.8668 | 0.8660 | 0.8664 | 0.8663 | 0.7328 | 0.9189 | 0.9178 | 0.9183 | 0.9183 | 0.8366 |
CNCI | 0.8535 | 0.8728 | 0.8631 | 0.8618 | 0.7263 | 0.9128 | 0.9051 | 0.9089 | 0.9093 | 0.8179 |
PLEK | 0.8715 | 0.8255 | 0.8485 | 0.8519 | 0.6970 | 0.9346 | 0.9124 | 0.9235 | 0.9244 | 0.8740 |
CPC2 | 0.8948 | 0.7835 | 0.8391 | 0.8476 | 0.6783 | 0.7650 | 0.9235 | 0.8443 | 0.8308 | 0.6885 |
LncFinder | 0.8815 | 0.8838 | 0.8826 | 0.8825 | 0.7653 | 0.9491 | 0.9321 | 0.9406 | 0.9411 | 0.8813 |
Bold numbers indicate the highest value. LncFinder has the best performance. In our test, CPC could not process the protein-coding transcripts of zebrafish; thus, only the result of lncRNAs is obtained.