Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 4;48(2):996–1009. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz1123

Table 2.

Response function parameters

Figure Promoter y min y max K n R 2 Equation
S5A Pvg6 410.6±7.48 2205.8±52.54 1.9±0.11 3.3±0.33 0.994 (2)
S5A PgamA 747.3±25.97 5317.4±37.45 1.5±0.05 3.8±0.25 0.999 (2)
S5A Psg2 547.9±17.47 8234.6±31.09 1.2±0.04 3.0±0.18 0.999 (2)
S5B Pvg6 45.8±0.68 308.8±3.79 1.4±0.07 5.5±0.61 0.998 (2)
S5B PgamA 48.3±3.61 544.1±4.77 0.92±0.01 2.9±0.11 0.999 (2)
S5B Psg2 29.2±4.05 1171.4±17.47 1.4±0.04 3.8±0.19 0.998 (2)
3A Pvg6 108.6±6.56 2309.2±113.79 1.9±0.13 2.1±0.15 0.992 (2)
3A PgamA 179.2±92.75 5444.4±114.62 1.6±0.09 2.5±0.25 0.996 (2)
3A Psg2 78.6±11.05 8471.1±202.69 1.5±0.08 2.7±0.15 0.997 (2)
3B Pvg6 6851.3±40.26 15091.8±131.70 1.0±0.01 2.9±0.25 0.999 (3)
3B PgamA 1643.6±38.58 15210.5±136.52 0.64±0.009 2.7±0.07 0.999 (3)
3B Psg2 139.6±11.03 14821.8±138.88 0.64±0.02 3.2±0.13 0.999 (3)
3C Psg2 49.6±2.97 15319.7±94.13 0.89±0.010 4.2±0.07 0.999 (2)
3C Psg2 87.1±8.43 14969.5±55.50 0.66±0.008 3.9±0.10 0.999 (3)

Response data of activation or repression were fitted to equation (2) or equation (3), respectively. Explanation about these parameters are provided in the main text. The parameters presented in the table are empirically-derived and cannot be interpreted as physical parameters, but that provide a good quantitative handle to compare relative strengths and dynamic ranges of the promoters tested.