Table 2.
Figure | Promoter | y min | y max | K | n | R 2 | Equation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S5A | Pvg6 | 410.6±7.48 | 2205.8±52.54 | 1.9±0.11 | 3.3±0.33 | 0.994 | (2) |
S5A | PgamA | 747.3±25.97 | 5317.4±37.45 | 1.5±0.05 | 3.8±0.25 | 0.999 | (2) |
S5A | Psg2 | 547.9±17.47 | 8234.6±31.09 | 1.2±0.04 | 3.0±0.18 | 0.999 | (2) |
S5B | Pvg6 | 45.8±0.68 | 308.8±3.79 | 1.4±0.07 | 5.5±0.61 | 0.998 | (2) |
S5B | PgamA | 48.3±3.61 | 544.1±4.77 | 0.92±0.01 | 2.9±0.11 | 0.999 | (2) |
S5B | Psg2 | 29.2±4.05 | 1171.4±17.47 | 1.4±0.04 | 3.8±0.19 | 0.998 | (2) |
3A | Pvg6 | 108.6±6.56 | 2309.2±113.79 | 1.9±0.13 | 2.1±0.15 | 0.992 | (2) |
3A | PgamA | 179.2±92.75 | 5444.4±114.62 | 1.6±0.09 | 2.5±0.25 | 0.996 | (2) |
3A | Psg2 | 78.6±11.05 | 8471.1±202.69 | 1.5±0.08 | 2.7±0.15 | 0.997 | (2) |
3B | Pvg6 | 6851.3±40.26 | 15091.8±131.70 | 1.0±0.01 | 2.9±0.25 | 0.999 | (3) |
3B | PgamA | 1643.6±38.58 | 15210.5±136.52 | 0.64±0.009 | 2.7±0.07 | 0.999 | (3) |
3B | Psg2 | 139.6±11.03 | 14821.8±138.88 | 0.64±0.02 | 3.2±0.13 | 0.999 | (3) |
3C | Psg2 | 49.6±2.97 | 15319.7±94.13 | 0.89±0.010 | 4.2±0.07 | 0.999 | (2) |
3C | Psg2 | 87.1±8.43 | 14969.5±55.50 | 0.66±0.008 | 3.9±0.10 | 0.999 | (3) |
Response data of activation or repression were fitted to equation (2) or equation (3), respectively. Explanation about these parameters are provided in the main text. The parameters presented in the table are empirically-derived and cannot be interpreted as physical parameters, but that provide a good quantitative handle to compare relative strengths and dynamic ranges of the promoters tested.