Table 2.
Dataset | Sample selection method | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | RS | 69 | 88 |
KS | 69 | 98 | |
MLM | 74 | 78 | |
2 | RS | 79 | 63 |
KS | 79 | 80 | |
MLM | 81 | 80 | |
3 | RS | ||
Class 1 | 83 | 87 | |
Class 2 | 79 | 89 | |
Class 3 | 89 | 100 | |
KS | |||
Class 1 | 94 | 97 | |
Class 2 | 100 | 92 | |
Class 3 | 84 | 100 | |
MLM | |||
Class 1 | 94 | 92 | |
Class 2 | 95 | 95 | |
Class 3 | 84 | 100 | |
4 | RS | ||
Class 1 | 96 | 100 | |
Class 2 | 100 | 100 | |
Class 3 | 85 | 98 | |
Class 4 | 88 | 95 | |
KS | |||
Class 1 | 100 | 100 | |
Class 2 | 100 | 100 | |
Class 3 | 90 | 98 | |
Class 4 | 88 | 97 | |
MLM | |||
Class 1 | 100 | 100 | |
Class 2 | 100 | 100 | |
Class 3 | 95 | 98 | |
Class 4 | 88 | 99 | |
5 | RS | 94 | 88 |
KS | 94 | 95 | |
MLM | 94 | 91 | |
6 | RS | 70 | 70 |
KS | 72 | 84 | |
MLM | 72 | 89 |