Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 26.

Published in final edited form as: Brain Cogn. 2019 Dec 27;139:105511. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2019.105511

Table 4.

Model results: Effect of CGG repeat length on the Hayling inhibition variables

Predictor	Type III Sum of Squares
	Hayling Latency Score			Hayling Error Score
	F	p	η²_p	F	p	η²_p
Education level	0.55	.651	0.01	2.49	.064	0.06
Linear CGG	6.86	.009^*	0.05	0.09	.761	0.00
Quadratic CGG	6.79	.010^*	0.05	0.10	.751	0.00
Cubic CGG	6.53	.012^*	0.05	0.10	.747	0.00

^*

p < .050