5.
Differential outcomes in USA, Europe and China
| Country/
Region |
Time MIPD initiated | MIPD volume for pancreatic head cancer | Number of studies | Advantages | Disadvantages |
| MIPD, minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy; NCDB, American National Cancer Database; LPD, laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy; OPD, open pancreaticoduodenectomy. | |||||
| USA | 20th century, the earliest | >3,700 | 14 | 1. Surgeons in USA are proficient at MIPD
2. NCDB, multicenter data on MIPD 3. Complete data on neoadjuvant therapy |
Lack of surgical safety data |
| Europe | Later than USA | Approximately 1,000 | 4 | 1. Pan-European multicenter studies
2. The first report of a multicenter training program in LPD |
1. Restrict indications for MIPD
2. The definition of high-volume center is unreasonable |
| China | 2002 | <1,000 | 5 | 1. The first expert consensus on LPD
2. R0 resection rate is higher than that of other countries |
1. Lack of OPD control group
2. Lack of data on survival and neoadjuvant therapy 3. Lack of multicenter study |