Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 13;117(1):259–264. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1909501116

Table 2.

Contract farming and household income

1 2 3
Country FEs Admin. unit FEs Cluster FEs
All countries (n = 14,573) 0.140** 0.116*** 0.095***
(0.044) (0.031) (0.026)
Bangladesh (n = 2,677) −0.040 0.007
(0.072) (0.053)
Côte d’Ivoire (n = 2,686) 0.119** 0.077
(0.060) (0.054)
Mozambique (n = 1,443) 0.350* 0.268*
(0.190) (0.138)
Nigeria (n = 2,604) 0.007 0.006
(0.049) (0.049)
Tanzania (n = 2,621) 0.078 0.069
(0.057) (0.053)
Uganda (n = 2,542) 0.285*** 0.252***
(0.092) (0.078)

This table provides an overview of regression results by country. Full regression outputs displaying the complete set of control variables can be found in SI Appendix, Table S3. The log of income per capita and day is regressed on a binary variable capturing participation in contract farming. SEs clustered at the country level (column 1), administrative (Admin.) unit level (column 2), or cluster level (column 3) are shown in parentheses. FEs, fixed effects. *P < 0.1, **P < 0.05, ***P < 0.01.